Of them formed the first stars, , galaxies, among which including was our Planet .V future of elementary particles in the celestial spheres were formed simplest component parts (elements), which became the beginning of the chemical evolution of the universe. These elements on Earth (and perhaps in other celestial spheres) gave the first chemical compounds - carbides, which combines with water vapor, led to the origin of hydrocarbons, and then - to the emergence of hydrogen and oxygen compounds. During the further evolution appeared colloidal solution of which fell dissolved substances in the form of sludge, jelly or gel. This gel, which broke into pieces, had the ability to absorb and fed soluble organic matter. But These substances have ended, and left to gel pieces two ways - either eat their mates, or create an apparatus for the supply of inorganic substances.
As a result, only those pieces that "go on one of the ways were able to save themselves for later life. Developing and improving further, they gave, finally, the forms (simple - HZ) of organisms that we observe in the present "(8). The occurrence of these protozoa was the beginning of biological evolution of the universe and the origin of life in it. So we can say that the universe has a meaningful beginning of physical evolution. But if it has a physical end? On this occasion should be noted that formed during the long evolution of the universe today with all its living and nonliving forms of life, as in the beginning of its formation, increasing the speed of light.
The second line of thought consists of affirming that the same man being conquering of the universe, a great tamer that creates conditions to live it better finishes conditional for the proper conditions that it creates, that is, if it becomes prisoner of itself exactly, from there the justification of the heading: Man: conditional animal. Not before saying on the public and the private one; the work the action and the work that are typical terms of the universe of Arendt. Still like the heading we have the definition of Aristotle for who the man is zoon politikon, that is, animal politician, and later, with Toms the man if transforms into social animal, in both the cases the men is not dismissed of reason, but the denomination goes moving in the measure where the studies on the human behavior advance. to leave well pontuado the source that we will take to take the handle this study, valley to say that for Arendt the man is not endowed with a nature, but of a condition. Condition this that can be shaken by any of the human beings, for Arendt all person that are born is ' ' factor of instabilidade' ' for planet, since we do not know of what such person is capable, we know imposes a fine on that the human potential in such a way pra creation as it stops destruction is almost limitless. As Arendt in the introduction says: ' ' Not yet we know if this situation is definitive; but it can come to occur that we, creatures human beings who we put in them to never act as inhabitants of the universe, let us arrive to understand, that is, to think and to speak on what, however, we are capable of fazer' ' . Some typical terms of the arendtiano universe. Before adentrarmos to it has properly said, agrees to explicitar some terms that are important for the understanding of what the author if it considers to say e, consequently, of what we intend to say on what it says.
If the substance was divisible until the infinite o, assumes then that this division was made? therefore if the substance will be genuinely divisible in this way, nothing of incoherent will have in this assumption. Which the size of the fragmentos that result of this division? If they will have some magnitude, then, for the hypothesis of the infinite divisibility, it would be possible dividiz them of new; therefore, they have of being fragmentos without extension, as the geometric points. But what it can be divided another time can be joined: if to saw a trunk, dividing it in many pieces, can come back to join stops them to form a trunk of the same so great. But if our fragmentos do not have any magnitude, as can they have been joined to form the extensive portion of substance with that we started? The substance cannot consist mere of geometric points, not even in an infinite number of them; we have to conclude, therefore, that the divisibility has an end and that the fragmentos smallest have of being particles with size and form. (KENNY, 1998, p.40) In accordance with Cotrim (1995) Democritus explained, through three basic factors, the different compositions of atoms: Figure: the geometric form of each atoms? Order: the space sequence of atoms in one same figure.
Position: the space localization of atoms. For Democritus, the infinite possibilities of agglomeration of atoms explain the infinite variety of existing things. The main contribution brought for the atomism of Democritus to the history of the thought is the mechanist conception. ... That is ' ' it swims is born of the nothing, nothing returns to nada' '.
Everything has a cause. the atoms are the last cause of the world. (COTRIM, 1995, p.94) the SOFISTAS the Sofistas appear, in Greece, a time that the democracy if installs. In accordance with Chau (1995), so that the opinion of a citizen was accepted in the assemblies, was necessary to know to speak in public and to be capable to persuade, so that its wills, or of its classroom, were accepted.